‣
- 1. Dysfunctional phase (4 things) =
- tears of annulus,
- disc dehydration [DDD, spinal stenosis].
- There is conversion of type 2 collagen to type 1 fibrocartillage ➔ stiffening of the Nucleus pulposus
- 2. Instability - [spondylolisthesis]
- 3. Restabilization = osteophyte formation, buckling of ligamentum flavum
[tear, dehydration, conversion, stiffening]
‣
- 3 types of modic changes described by Modic in 1988
- Type 1 = Hypointense on T1 and hyperintense on T2 (bone marrow edema)
- Type 2 Hyperintense on both T1 and T2 = conversion of red hemapoietic bone marrow into yellow fatty marrow due to marrow ischemia.
- Type 3 = Both T1 and T2 hypointense. = subchondral sclerosis
‣
- Type 1 - found to have more LBP
- Type 1 found to have higher incidence of segmental hypermobility, unstable lesions
‣
- Aseptic gas collection e.g. nitrogen, oxygen or CO2 within the disc
- Closely associated with intervertebral disc degeneration, modic changes and subchondral sclerosis
‣
- Red flags
- Neurogenic vs vascular claudication - 3 points
- Bench to bench vs lamp to lamp
- Pain relieved in dependant position
- Neurogenic better when climbing stairs
- Cauda Equina!
‣
- 2 pathophysiology = ischemia and mechanical compression
- Ischemia
- Increased compression leads to reduced spinal canal volume ➔ venous congestion ➔ diminished arterial flow to nerves
- Walking exacerbates oxygen demand
- Mechanical compression
- Direct nerve root compression
- Worse when spine in extension due to buckling of ligamentum flavum
‣
- CLFE
- Central stenosis - will hit traversing roots
- Lateral recess aka subarticular = begins at the medial border of the superior articular process and extends to the medial border of the pedicle - will hit traversing roots aka " paracentral" when used to describe disc
- Foraminal recess [Mid-zone] = between medial and lateral border of pedicles - hit exiting roots
- Extra-foraminal/ Far lateral recess [Exit zone] = lateral to lateral border of pedicle - exitting roots
‣
- It is the process anteriorly
‣
- By anatomical location
- By Etiology
- Congenital - achondroplasia, scoliosis (neuromuscular, idiopathic…), kyphosis
- Degeneration - OA, DISH, Spondylolisthesis
- Metabolic - Paget’s disease
‣
‣
- Low injectate volumes (0.5–0.6 mL) to reduce inadvertent spread to other roots.
- Aim to inject extra-foraminal area to prevent spread to avoid targeting traversing nerve roots
- Mainly diagnostic in nature
‣
- Injection is within foramen = want it to spread over area and also target traversing nerve roots
‣
- Kambin's triangle = aim above pedicle.
- If want to target L5 nerve root, aim above the L5 pedicle (
- Triangle made up of the exiting nerve root as the hypotenuse, traversing nerve root as the height and the proximal vertebral end plate as the base.
- Subpedicular approach = aim below the pedicle. (If want to target L5 nerve root, aim below the L5 pedicle)
arm-35-833.pdf700.9KB
‣
- injection is usually midline and placed directly between two vertebrae (similar to the approach a woman undergoes during labor for epidural anesthesia)
‣
- Physio, analgesia, Neuromodulators - Gabapentin
‣
- Stand for: Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial
- A multicenter RCT over 13 centers; comparing op vs Non op for Spinal stenosis with and without Spondylolisthesis involving patients published in NEJM 2008 and JBJS in 2009
- "Found that when undergo as treated analysis, Surgery gave better outcomes for both conditions"
- "Aware of criticisms - high loss to follow up (64% left), high cross over rates, no standardized surgery (fuse or no fuse) or non op"
- Results - Spinal Stenosis without Listhesis
- Surgery is decompressive laminectomy only
- Intention to treat analysis – no difference
- As treated Analysis – surgery better for all outcomes
- SPORT no listhesis.pdf
- Results - SS with Spondylolisthesis
- Intention to treat analysis – no difference
- As treated analysis – Surgery better than non op at 2 year and 4 year
- SPORT with listhesis.pdf
- Results for discectomy
- High cross over - 50% of those to surgery did not have surgery, 30% of non op received surgery
- ITT analysis - no difference
- ATT - Surgery greater improvement in outcome measures for 4 and 8 years
- Criticisms of SPORT trial
- No consistent surgical mx as it can be decompression alone, + fusion or even instrumentation (for spondylolisthesis)
- No specific protocol for non Op mx
- Very high cross over rates. Only 33% randomized to op underwent op; 43% randomized to non-op underwent op!
- High drop out rate with only 64% remaining at 8 year mark
‣
- No consensus in literature. No role for routine fusion unless presence of spondylolisthesis
- For fusion: Ghogawala NEJM RCT of 66 patients with stable grade 1 spondylolisthesis. Re-operation for fusion was 14% vs 34%. but no significant improvement in function. Higher cost and longer surgery
- Not for Fusion: Peter Forsth et al. 247 patients stratified randomized with or without presence of spondylolisthesis. Found that with or without spondylolisthesis, fusion did not result in better clinical outcomes at 2 or 5 years.
- In my practice, I will
- Fuse when presence of dynamic instability (flex extend views, facet fluid) or axial back pain present
- OR iatrogenic decompression resulting in instability (complete laminectomy OR excision > 50% of facet joints)
ghogawala2016.pdf256.0KB
‣
- 5 categories and 8 non organic tests
- Categories - tenderness, simulation, distration, regional disturbance, over-reaction
Canon of DORTS D - distraction - SLR in sitting/ standing is different O - over reaction - facial expression R - Regional - non dermatomal sensory loss or patchy weakness T - tender - even skin S - stimulated - axial load head, rotation
‣
- 3 or more signs = non organic back pain but DOES NOT equate to malingering
- Should do more comprehensive testing
DISCOGRAPHY
‣
- Diagnostic test; Radio-opaque dye injected into disc under fluoroscopic guidance
- In normal disc, dye remains in nucelus and appears as a 'cotton ball'
- In a herniated disc, dye outlines the fissue to or through the outer annulus
- Diffusely degenerated disc - contrast spreads throughout the disc and disc space may appear narrow on lateral radiography
- This can then be supplemented with a post procedure CT (CT discography)
‣
- Grade 0 = contrast agent within normal nucleus pulposus
- Grade 1 = agent extend radially along fissue involving inner 1/3 of AF
- Grade 2 = agent extend to middle 1/3 of AF
- Grade 3 = agent extent into outer 1/3 of AF
- Grade 4 = grade 3 with involvement of more than 30 ° of disc circumference
‣
- 5 criteria Based on the Spine Intervention Society (SIS) guidelines
- 1. Pain must be similar or exactly like the patient's clinical pain "Concordance"
- 2. Volume limit of 3ml contrast
- 3. Pressurization no greater than 50 psi above opening pressure
- 4. Adjacent discs act as controls - painless or non concordant pain
- 5. Radiographic image of disc must be abnormal from another source.
- https://academic.oup.com/painmedicine/article/19/1/3/3074755
‣
- It is an invasive procedure
- Short term risks - discitis, acute disc herniation
- Long term risks - some studies show higher rate of lumbar disc degeneration
- Risk of post procedure discitis
Bertolloti Syndrome
‣
- Back pain caused by lumbosacral transtional vertebrae (LSTV)
- Lumbarised S1 or Sacralized L5!
‣
- Castellvi Classification